Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z87X-UD5H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime16.9 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 12:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 488
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Palit(1569 1187) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.6
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 36.9
26% 29.7 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 32.2
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LS 240GB-$110
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM05.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 294 195 51 104 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 443
Write 370
Mixed 233
SusWrite 131
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 19.9
84% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 71.6
83% 140 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59%
Great: 91%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
107GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 162 162 152 116 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 385
Write 176
Mixed 148
SusWrite 151
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 21.9
91% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 53.7
85% 166 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 88 92 89 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 134
Write 141
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 90
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 84%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB
227GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 9.6 10 12 11 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11.7
12% 8.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 39%
External RAID 1TB
89GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 37.9
50% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-148.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 9905403-148.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8GX 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback