Lenovo 439123G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 439123G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 439123G
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121003
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 820-$119
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 58.5
38% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 96.7
8-Core 150
15% 123 Pts
64-Core 148
9% 148 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 880M
Legend(17AA 2145) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 1.22
3% 3.07 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 3.52
3% 3.84 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2013)-$60
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 65 88 104 108 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 108
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 91.4
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B1G73DB0-YK0 80CE M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 6.4
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.6
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 439123G Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 439123G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback