Asus ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180702
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 162
2-Core 323
104% 192 Pts
4-Core 646
8-Core 922
98% 784 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 106%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 105
84% 106 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 95.4
Splatting 97.7
79% 96.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 40 43 43 33 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 514
Write 444
Mixed 424
SusWrite 85.1
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 33.6
172% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 18.2
32% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 85%
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L2 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: MAT21L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 226 226 226 228 228 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 476
Mixed 392
SusWrite 248
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 67.7
242% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 337
261% 357 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 127%
Great: 108%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 162 152 130 176 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43% Average
Read 333
Write 113
Mixed 123
SusWrite 173
41% 186 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 10.3
4K Mixed 13.9
53% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 20.3
26% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 100%
HFS512G32MND-3312A 512GB
231GB free
Firmware: 20001P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 469 468 471 471 469 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 468
Mixed 379
SusWrite 466
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 42.9
164% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 299
241% 340 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 115%
Great: 113%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
772GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 107 105 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 111
Write 102
Mixed 33
SusWrite 108
64% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Pop 16GB
11GB free, PID 5577
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.4 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Read 22.1
Write 14.9
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 4.7
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.7
159% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M4A2666C16 CMK8GX4M2A2400C14 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.8
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING Builds (Compare 810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-G GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback