Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89TD PRO USB3  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 14:10
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 72
2-Core 140
60% 98.3 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 437
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 431
27% 431 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 115
Parallax 101
90% 109 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 104
Splatting 105
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 314 303 313 302 280 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 446
Write 307
Mixed 295
SusWrite 302
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 35.8
133% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 149
140% 219 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
675GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 95 95 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 84.7
Write 87.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 94.3
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.6% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 12.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A89TD PRO USB3 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89TD PRO USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback