MSI X299 XPOWER GAMING AC (MS-7A91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A91
MotherboardMSI X299 XPOWER GAMING AC (MS-7A91)  (all builds)
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 10:12
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 90
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 540
8-Core 1,068
95% 804 Pts
64-Core 1,904
118% 1,904 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3603) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 192
Parallax 175
151% 184 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 180
Splatting 125
115% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 527 527 532 528 528 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,966
Write 1,234
Mixed 1,322
SusWrite 552
334% 1,519 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 53.9
178% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 840
DQ Mixed 717
548% 732 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 241%
Great: 332%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
681GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1960 1963 1962 1966 1970 1957 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 2,171
Write 1,954
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 1963
418% 1,858 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 57.2
189% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 718
551% 739 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 299%
Great: 372%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 819 827 828 837 839 841 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 895
Write 839
Mixed 772
SusWrite 832
188% 834 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 50.1
163% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 601
DQ Write 601
DQ Mixed 613
457% 605 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 164%
Great: 541%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 75
MC Mixed 43.4
154% 53.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 133%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 XPOWER GAMING AC (MS-7A91) Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299 XPOWER GAMING AC (MS-7A91)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $1,038
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback