MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A32)

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A32
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A32) (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180126
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '18 at 02:56
Run Duration	282 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 230 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 424 8-Core 678 68% 551 Pts	64-Core 939 58% 939 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.3.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 92.3 58% 74.2 fps	MRender 59.8 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 75.7 54% 64.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 263 256 258 259 258 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 2,152 Write 1,396 Mixed 649 SusWrite 315 248% 1,128 MB/s	4K Read 50.6 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 55.7 220% 80.6 MB/s	DQ Read 768 DQ Write 641 DQ Mixed 563 460% 657 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 236%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135 28,136 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 36GB free Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 947 Write 669 Mixed 444 151% 687 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 50.8 169% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 664 DQ Write 517 DQ Mixed 392 347% 524 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 144%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 711GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 83.3 Write 76.4 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 79.7 56% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 464GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 92 92 92 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	52% Above average	Read 89.4 Write 86.5 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 91.4 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 16,705 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4.5TB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 162 164 161 161 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 28GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 237 Write 92.4 Mixed 64 136% 131 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 8.4 695% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 12.7 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 10.3 823% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 825GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 84 83 83 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 88.7 Write 90.8 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 83.6 105% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 44%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 29GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 40 41 42 39 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 125 Write 42.9 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 41.9 70% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.5 157% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB 6,771 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.3% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 78%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A32)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	4x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	5x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	2x
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	2x
Premier SP550 480GBAdata $129Bench 82%, 8,505 samples	2x

RAM
CMR16GX4M2D3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 91%, 91 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 99%, 613 samples	2x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16