User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRAZER RAZER
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 02:15
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 447
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0416) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 6.69
3% 12.7 fps
MRender 9.24
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 7.65
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTE256HMHP-00000 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT2200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 246 255 256 256 257 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 435
Write 263
Mixed 180
SusWrite 252
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 67.9
4K Mixed 27.1
118% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 74.8
119% 231 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback