| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP xw8400 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A08h |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20061201 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 21:52 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon 5160
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
39.4%
Below average
|
38% 56.3 Pts
|
9% 64.9 Pts
|
4% 66 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
3.69%
Terrible
|
4% 4.26 fps
|
4% 4.65 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba THNSNF128GCSS 128GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FSLA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 94 160 143 92 MB/s
|
48.3%
Average
|
35% 158 MB/s
|
82% 26.7 MB/s
|
113% 143 MB/s
|
|
|
73.1%
Very good
|
76% 105 MB/s
|
242% 2.73 MB/s
| |
|
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
850GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 124 124 125 128 122 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
84% 113 MB/s
|
212% 1.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
13.2%
Very poor
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
11% 3.87 GB/s
|
38% 106 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical xw8400 Workstation Builds (Compare 55 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP xw8400 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 8x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E53451stBench 41%, 462 samples | 7x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
| GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |