TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GV62 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 13:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 189
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 375
49% 368 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 22.20.16.4708
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 5.62
0% 10.1 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 12.8
7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 2.52%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
710GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 12 12 17 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.87% Terrible
Read 5.8
Write 11.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 14.6
8% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 5.87%
 Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
6GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.7 7.2 7.2 6.5 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 116
Write 9.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6.5
28% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
47% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 21.4%
 Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,470x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,300x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,246x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,022x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples501x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples209x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples127x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples110x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples761x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples309x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples214x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback