Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 98.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 202 78% 134 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 493 56% 440 Pts	64-Core 483 30% 483 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MBF-1AN1ZABHA 128GB 367 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: M603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 155 155 156 141 146 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.2% Above average	Read 207 Write 236 Mixed 210 SusWrite 144 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 32.5 107% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 88.2 DQ Mixed 39.2 36% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 240GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 61 58 64 52 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Read 81.2 Write 77.2 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 57.2 53% 70.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 74%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 67GB free Firmware: 4.AAA SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 62 61 65 55 60 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	42.7% Average	Read 89.2 Write 94.2 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 59.4 53% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.7 29% 10 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.9 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 44.5 90% 44.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	14x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $73

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16