Asus CM6650

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6650  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6650
Memory1.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110211
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 15:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 77.2
2-Core 155
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 276
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 3.72
3% 4.16 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.04
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 92 111 98 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 213
Write 130
Mixed 123
SusWrite 104
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 27.4
4K Mixed 16.1
61% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 19.9
DQ Write 46.4
DQ Mixed 23.7
21% 30 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 48%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$78
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 124 125 126 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 127
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 75%
HzW RAID 5 9TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 14 16 16 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Read 21
Write 12.2
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 14.1
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
13% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 74%
SV FAST 8TB
1TB free, PID 020a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.3
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 21
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 1.2
190% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-001.A00LF SLZ3128M8-EDJED 99U5471-002.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6650 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6650

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $215
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback