Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.6% Very good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 71% 130 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 757 72% 593 Pts	64-Core 1,116 69% 1,116 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% XFX(1682 C580) CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.1.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 70.3 Parallax 85.4 57% 75 fps	MRender 69 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 56.6 52% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 652 325 327 321 219 215 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,910 Write 1,514 Mixed 622 SusWrite 343 243% 1,098 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 87.7 4K Mixed 45.2 159% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 867 DQ Write 694 DQ Mixed 639 517% 734 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 164 165 164 167 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 126 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 164 98% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 38GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 161 161 164 154 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 146 Write 133 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 161 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 114%
LSI Logical Volume 6TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1.5TB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 296 295 295 295 296 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 26% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 725GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 143 143 142 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 142 Write 101 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 142 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 832GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 155 159 158 156 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 84.5 Write 124 Mixed 66 SusWrite 156 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 114%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID null, Sandisk Ultra 32 GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 15 15 14 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 19.5 Write 16.3 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 14.8 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3.2 202% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 33.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 35.7 45% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x16GB 1,900 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.5% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 23.4 MC Mixed 25.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 26.5 SC Mixed 21.5 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	43x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $452

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16