MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 04:44
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 441
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 44.8
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.4
36% 38.3 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 37.5
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 171 22 19 34 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 469
Write 136
Mixed 315
SusWrite 53.1
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 37.4
141% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 204
174% 252 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 95%
Pcie SSD 128GB
87GB free
Firmware: E8FM11.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 141 137 139 129 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 748
Write 370
Mixed 539
SusWrite 182
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 35.6
118% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 334
273% 384 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 96%
Great: 180%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
94GB free
Firmware: GH2ZB550
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 98.6
Write 81.3
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 77.4
50% 69.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 72%
WL250GSA1672 251GB
217GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 58 59 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 59
Write 47
Mixed 47.2
SusWrite 58.1
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 30
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 88.2
45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback