PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-P35C-S3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090619 |
Uptime | 2.6 Days |
Run Date | Aug 07 '18 at 21:34 |
Run Duration | 209 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
43.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8553) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 180 189 176 153 157 MB/s
|
54.9%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD3200YS-01PGB0 320GB
10GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
12.3%
Very poor
|
||||
NORELSYS 106X 250GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
NORELSYS 106X 320GB
2GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
||||
JetFlash Transcend 128GB
118GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 14 14 15 14 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
SAMSUNG SP2514N 250GB
75GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1 1 1.1 1 1.9 MB/s
|
1.9%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
18.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples | 2x |
Core2 Duo E8600Intel $180Bench 44%, 6,109 samples | 1x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples | 1x |
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |