Asus X99-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus X99-E (all builds)
Memory	53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170811
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 07 '18 at 13:02
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$190 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 84 1-Core 129 2-Core 234 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 750 71% 588 Pts	64-Core 964 60% 964 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 93%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 800GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 533GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 281 270 313 326 325 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 724 Write 332 Mixed 254 SusWrite 302 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 21.9 84% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 412 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 288 222% 307 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 109%
MB4000GCWDC 4TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 30GB free Firmware: HPGH SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 149 Write 40.8 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 41 50% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 104%
MB4000GVYZK 4TB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 1TB free Firmware: HPG2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 150 Write 39.8 Mixed 53 SusWrite 40.4 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 143% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 117%
MB4000GCWDC 4TB 677 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: HPGI SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 164 164 167 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 165 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 165 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M386A4G40DM0-CPB 2x31.5GB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 8 slots used 63GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	66.9% Good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 21.6 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 16.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-E Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $107Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	273x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	90x
Core i7-6850KIntel $190Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	101x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	40x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	15x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16