Acer Aspire X5950

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire X5950  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X5950
Memory3.4 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 15:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 550-$110
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 80
2-Core 131
57% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 184
26% 189 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
MSI(1462 2715) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 22.2
13% 18.4 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 18.6
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CCA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.9 9.2 12 9.7 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Read 5.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 9.7
6% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B2873FHS-CH9 5GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X5950 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X5950

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback