Acer Aspire 5739G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire 5739G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JM50-MV
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091120
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 14:46
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 39
1-Core 27.8
2-Core 47.1
25% 38 Pts
4-Core 30.8
8-Core 34.7
4% 32.8 Pts
64-Core 28.1
2% 28.1 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130M
Acer(1025 021E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 5.12
Parallax 0.88
2% 2.76 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.13
3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.3b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 86 89 84 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.7% Poor
Read 136
Write 101
Mixed 122
SusWrite 89.1
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 16.1
54% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 24.6
24% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 80%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
154GB free
Firmware: PB4OC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 51 54 50 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 51
Write 47.3
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 52.2
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.22% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.9
6% 2.03 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 207
19% 207 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 7.22%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5739G Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5739G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback