Apple MacBookPro14,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro14,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-551B86E5744E2388
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 09:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 78.1
1-Core 88
2-Core 166
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 513
48% 399 Pts
64-Core 508
32% 508 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 560
Apple(106B 0179) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 907 MHz, MLim: 1270 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.6
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 23.7
Parallax 29.1
20% 25.7 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 25.1
20% 23.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512L 500GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXS5EA0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1499 1598 1602 1639 1642 1621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,753
Write 1,623
Mixed 963
SusWrite 1,600
334% 1,485 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 39.5
149% 55.9 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 620
460% 615 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 240%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D5435324C31473332443450472D30393320 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 22.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 19.9
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro14,3 Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro14,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback