MSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7522
MotherboardMSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 15:53
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 148
66% 107 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 415
44% 351 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1354 MHz, MLim: 1662 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 29.9
Reflection 38.5
Parallax 32.9
24% 33.8 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 32.7
27% 33.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSA2M160G2GC 256GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT06L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 139 127 149 149 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 196
Write 56.7
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 142
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 24.5
83% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.8
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 28.1
24% 34.4 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
318GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 156 156 153 154 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 155
Write 118
Mixed 61
SusWrite 155
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 16.8
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 16.2
26% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
90% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Pro (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI X58 Pro (MS-7522)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback