MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7641
MotherboardMSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 14:57
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 81
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 116
54% 85.6 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 258
30% 235 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2297 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 28.8
Parallax 0.16
31% 22.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 32.1
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 500GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 121 151 123 93 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 159
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 122
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 133%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
535GB free
Firmware: 2AR2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 93 88 80 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 75.4
Write 42.1
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 87.8
46% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST4000LM016-1N21 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 108 99 86 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 76.3
Write 132
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 99.2
66% 89.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 21 19 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 17.9
Write 20.3
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 18.9
26% 19 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]181(F/R)0 99[2/7/4]181(F/R)0 8GB
1157, 1157 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.3
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 760GM-P34(FX) (MS-7641) - $79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback