Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '18 at 16:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 132
2-Core 266
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 627
75% 578 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 42.2
31% 37.4 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 34.7
29% 36 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 48.5
Mixed 74.3
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
ADATA HD650 1TB
136GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.3
Write 72
Mixed 29.3
62% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 11.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback