Biostar A58MD

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar A58MD (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '18 at 09:47
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5300 APU-$36 7,032 User benchmarks, average bench 40% P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49.4% Average	Memory 83 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 95.3 53% 80.6 Pts	4-Core 95.2 8-Core 95.2 13% 95.2 Pts	64-Core 94.3 6% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Sapphire(174B E266) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.8% Terrible	Lighting 7.7 Reflection 9.42 Parallax 9.28 6% 8.8 fps	MRender 10.5 Gravity 6.43 Splatting 11.2 8% 9.36 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.8% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 133 147 164 108 100 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.6% Good	Read 235 Write 154 Mixed 215 SusWrite 134 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 42 132% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 164 124% 165 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 152 152 154 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 182 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 152 100% 138 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 7 19% 6.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A58MD Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58MD

CPU
Athlon X4 840 Quad CoreAMDBench 45%, 4,588 samples	4x
A6-6400K APUAMD $81Bench 40%, 13,306 samples	2x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8470DAMDBench 3%, 8,268 samples	2x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	2x
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples	1x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
240GB 240GBNetacBench 66%, 2,483 samples	1x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
GR1600D364L11/8G 1x8GBGoodramBench 29%, 1,283 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16