TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 02 '18 at 08:36
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 136
2-Core 272
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 794
82% 662 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 96.7%
 Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 10 12 15 18 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 119
Write 160
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 16.1
73% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
99% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 38.9%
 Great: 109%
ADATA HD650 1TB
137GB free, PID a35a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 69.6
Write 70.4
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 73.2
79% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 30.2%
 Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 44.2%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel  $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples406x
Core i5-8600KIntel  $125Bench 91%, 264,837 samples186x
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples106x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples106x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples105x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples61x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples36x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples32x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples30x
RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples32x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples30x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $56Bench 81%, 84,291 samples25x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback