Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 88 2-Core 177 70% 119 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 344 47% 350 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0627A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 5.6 8.8 18 5.9 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 316 Write 54.3 Mixed 27.8 SusWrite 38.2 23% 109 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 57.3 4K Mixed 1.1 70% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 19.4 DQ Mixed 0.4 18% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 81%
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 106GB free Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 126 126 126 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 117 Write 112 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 126 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 N/A HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 N/A 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 16.1 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 65.2 61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	62x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x

RAM
99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 99U5474-015.A00LF Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 50%, 11 samples	9x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	6x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	4x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16