Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 582
78% 583 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.3% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 62.8
43% 56.5 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 38.5
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
76GB free
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,657
Write 1,464
Mixed 1,323
330% 1,481 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 70.1
256% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 802
668% 951 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 59 62 63 64 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 174
Write 77
Mixed 104
SusWrite 62.3
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 26.7
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 87.7
70% 100 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 51%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 118 128 179 153 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 11
Write 49.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 150
42% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.3
243% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
758GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 107 110 110 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62% Good
Read 110
Write 101
Mixed 34
SusWrite 106
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62%
Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
640GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 113 124 124 123 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 104
Write 140
Mixed 71
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
217% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
4TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 154 155 154 157 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 106
Write 145
Mixed 110
SusWrite 155
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 35.5
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 33.2
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 41.5
SC Mixed 29.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback