| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20091215 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 31 '18 at 19:11 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom X3 8450
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
|
49.6%
Average
|
43% 63.4 Pts
|
15% 114 Pts
|
7% 114 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.1%
Poor
|
26% 33.2 fps
|
30% 37.2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
29.2%
Poor
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-MA770-DS3 Builds (Compare 16 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA770-DS3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 3x |
| Phenom 9850AMDBench 46%, 2,080 samples | 2x |
| Phenom 9550AMDBench 43%, 2,773 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 2x |
| Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples | 2x |
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 33% - Below average | Total price: $300 |