A A measure of PC gaming performance that includes frame drops.
Average Fps don't tell the whole story. High average Fps can be accompanied by stuttering which results in a poor overall gaming experience. Effective Fps (EFps) measure gaming experience using both average Fps and frame drops. Frame drops are quantified using the following four statistics:

0.1% and 1% Lows (Avg|Max)

To calculate the 0.1% low all the frames in a sample are sorted from slowest to fastest. For a 60 second sample, the frames in the first 0.1%: 60s * 0.1% = 60s/1000 = 0.06s are used to determine the 0.1% low. The average and maximum Fps of those (slowest) frames are the Avg|Max 0.1% lows. A similar calculation is used for the Avg and Max 1% lows. (download example calc spreadsheet )

EFps vs Fps

EFps are calibrated to match average Fps for most games (e.g. GTAV). Where frame delivery is very consistent EFps are higher than average Fps (e.g. Overwatch). Where frames are relatively inconsistent EFps are lower than average Fps (e.g. CSGO). EFps incorporate and improve upon average Fps as a measure of real world playability.

Game choice

Benchmarks from turn based games such as Total War*, Civ* or canned benchmarks such as Ulletical's CSGO and the built in benchmarks in many games are essentially rendering benchmarks. Game benchmarks need to include user inputs in order to measure the stability of frames whilst a user is actually playing. Using games that nobody plays is no better than using Cinebench. Benchmark data should include video footage of the game sequence and precise game settings so that users can replicate the scores.

Bottlenecks

PC components are similar to links in a chain: weak components bottleneck the whole system. For example: an AMD Ryzen 3700X bottlenecks an Nvidia 2070 Super. The 3700X costs 40% more money for 11% less performance. The lost performance is similar to downgrading from a 2070S to a 2060S. Publishing EFps data puts UserBenchmark in conflict with the marketers that represent billion dollar corporations, but it also helps our users to build faster PCs by dodging marketing traps. Users can verify EFps figures with Afterburner
EFps Benchmarks

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $240Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback