Asrock Z77 Extreme3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics63.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '18 at 20:22
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 558
55% 452 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
63.9% Good
Lighting 82.1
Reflection 57
Parallax 104
67% 81.1 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 74
58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 51 32 81 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 486
Write 464
Mixed 362
SusWrite 94.5
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 29.4
101% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 188
188% 300 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
466GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 138 142 141 138 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 164
Write 157
Mixed 57
SusWrite 141
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99[2/7/4]031 8394 99[2/7/4]031 029E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 01BA 4GBH2X02E99927-16- 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme3 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $477
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback