Packard EasyNote TS11HR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS11HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '16 at 15:43
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 113
57% 89 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 156
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Acer(1025 0511) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.27
Reflection 3.42
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.17
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1059GSM 1TB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GL001U Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
40% Average
Read 67.7
Write 71.5
Mixed 77.1
55% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 14.5
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS11HR Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS11HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback