Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive483% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 06:25
Run Duration310 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 137
2-Core 258
93% 164 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 760
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2919 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 209
Parallax 185
157% 195 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 186
Splatting 134
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1616 1684 1739 1762 1763 1745 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
483% Outstanding
Read 2176
Write 1,762
Mixed 1,936
SusWrite 1,718
427% 1,898 MB/s
4K Read 246
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 218
761% 223 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1,128
DQ Mixed 1,210
918% 1,239 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 483%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
454GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 458 462 464 465 465 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 462
Mixed 422
SusWrite 460
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 69.1
236% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 138%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
343GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 488 488 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 474
Mixed 425
SusWrite 488
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 69.3
237% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 140%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
273GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 489 489 490 490 491 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 467
Mixed 421
SusWrite 489
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 71.1
242% 87.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 364
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 142%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
276GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1974 1969 1906 1894 1893 1907 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,441
Write 1,931
Mixed 925
SusWrite 1,924
404% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 75.1
266% 98.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1,203
DQ Mixed 1,123
879% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 353%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 34.8
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 45.3
SC Mixed 34.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 50.6
79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback