Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 27 '18 at 02:32
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 739
74% 602 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2919 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 208
Parallax 202
154% 200 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 184
Splatting 129
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 480GB-$900
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E2010325 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1699 1760 1933 1817 1744 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
484% Outstanding
Read 2284
Write 1,956
Mixed 2093
SusWrite 1,682
451% 2,004 MB/s
4K Read 244
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 218
756% 222 MB/s
DQ Read 1,381
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,210
918% 1240 MB/s
Poor: 280%
This bench: 484%
Great: 541%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 445 452 450 456 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 462
Mixed 414
SusWrite 440
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 69
235% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
343GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 488 488 487 488 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 460
Mixed 416
SusWrite 488
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 68.8
234% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
273GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 488 488 488 487 488 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 463
Mixed 414
SusWrite 488
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 70.3
238% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 140%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
276GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2005 1986 1906 1909 1907 1910 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
353% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 1,939
Mixed 943
SusWrite 1,937
406% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 75.3
265% 98.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1,195
DQ Mixed 1,134
883% 1213 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 353%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 35.1
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 45.8
SC Mixed 33.1
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 51.2
78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback