Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Pro3-M  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110621
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 10:42
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 191
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 461
46% 376 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Asus(1043 03B4) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 14.8
14% 15.4 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 17.4
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 73 47 98 121 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 121
Write 118
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 89
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 75%
TomTom GPS Music Watch 3GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.9 5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 5.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.8
8% 6.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Hitachi HTS542516K9SA00 160GB
90GB free, PID 110c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 19.4
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 11.5
24% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 17%
Seagate Portable 1TB
100GB free, PID 2300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.79% Terrible
Read 27.7
Write 24.9
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 15.7
26% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.79%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905458-026.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.3% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Pro3-M Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Pro3-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback