Toshiba Satellite E55-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 69% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite E55-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ZEMAA
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 20:40
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 96%
CPU Throttled 69%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 120
54% 88.4 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 181
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FAD0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.93
Reflection 5.08
Parallax 5.34
2% 4.45 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 34 36 32 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 75.1
Write 72
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 40.6
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 57%
WD My Book 25EE 3TB
509GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 161 161 142 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 127
SusWrite 156
205% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
221GB free, PID 0212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 85 92 92 82 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 95.9
Write 93.4
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 89
99% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38%
Great: 44%
WD My Book 1TB
542GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 16 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 31.7
Mixed 27
SusWrite 17.6
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 22%
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
851GB free, PID 0374
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 18 18 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 9.5
Write 25.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 17.3
32% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 64D0JKHNK 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 15.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite E55-A Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite E55-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback