Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L750 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '16 at 15:09
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 86.8 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 127 60% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 178 24% 177 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 525M 9,032 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FC50) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451 Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Lighting 2.83 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.75 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 3.07 Splatting 2.09 2% 3.16 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13874 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1287 (B1) Unknown 91 91 103 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 50 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 15 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17818305094	66% Good	Read 488 Write 279 Mixed 312 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 14.6 77% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 13.9 48% 107 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 108%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 7GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 54.6 Write 63.2 Mixed 49.6 72% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.23 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-035.A00LF Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 17 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.9 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 525MNvidiaBench 2%, 9,032 samples	227x
GeForce GT 520MNvidiaBench 2%, 5,654 samples	66x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	43x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	73x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	24x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	19x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16