Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	40.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '18 at 10:22
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Memory 92.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 201 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 496 56% 441 Pts	64-Core 497 31% 497 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.52% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 6.38 6% 7.62 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 7.87 Splatting 8.61 7% 8.79 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.52% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0G09 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 10431 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1032 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 65 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 11355948058387 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 85 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	40.9% Average	Read 267 Write 182 Mixed 203 48% 217 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 41.2 4K Mixed 5.07 58% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 5.15 22% 45 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 126736624 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1043 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 400932 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 10321 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1033 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 68 488112157 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1031 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 63 63 74749 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 73014444061 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 132959302592385 (F1) Unknown 100 253 180248354611 (F2) Unknown 100 253 8655439636	98.4% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 167 Mixed 153 124% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.43 124% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC72C8PG0N 4x4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 39.8 MC Mixed 35.8 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16