Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C655D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C655D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '18 at 22:59
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-240
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Memory 13.8
1-Core 4.4
2-Core 8.4
7% 8.88 Pts
4-Core 9
8-Core 13.4
1% 11.2 Pts
64-Core 17.3
1% 17.3 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 42%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
670GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P2C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 82.9
Write 79.2
Mixed 35.3
48% 65.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.15
33% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 57%
ADATA SH14 1TB
879GB free, PID a14a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 30
Write 28.1
Mixed 18.9
32% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.17
54% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 Micron 8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 10GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
MC Read 2
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.8
2% 0.57 GB/s
Latency 369
11% 369 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C655D Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C655D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $134
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback