Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 11 '18 at 15:01
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$47
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 68
2-Core 127
57% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 323
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8521) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 37.7
35% 41.2 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 34
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 391
Write 296
Mixed 268
70% 318 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 14.4
58% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.3
DQ Write 28
DQ Mixed 8.12
10% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 112
Write 120
Mixed 113
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.17
81% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 85%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
387GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 98.8
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.42
94% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
275GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 27.1
Mixed 16.5
29% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.27
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HC9N-DI 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.9
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback