ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1795

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star GP72 6QF
Motherboard	MSI MS-1795 (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180119
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '18 at 14:52
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	IRQ-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 85.8 1-Core 106 2-Core 198 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 375 8-Core 545 58% 460 Pts	64-Core 545 34% 545 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M 73,363 User benchmarks, average bench 16% MSI(1462 115B) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 20.2 19% 20.1 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 17.2 18% 21.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 505GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 101 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 109 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 61 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 53 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1026463755
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 292GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 82 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 95 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 48 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 54 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2030725182	93.7% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 471 Mixed 492 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 77.3 4K Mixed 27.3 134% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 48.6 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 80.2 70% 99.9 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 672GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 126 126 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 265 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 389 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 226 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5529 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 227634249767 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	64.7% Good	Read 114 Write 111 Mixed 120 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.07 4K Mixed 0.17 62% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 4,393 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 23.3 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	833x
Core i5-6300HQIntelBench 54%, 41,531 samples	96x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	72x

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	583x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	338x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	61x

SSD
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	64x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples	39x
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	39x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	167x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	157x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	81x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback