Lenovo 28479XU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 28479XU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 28479XU
Memory1.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120619
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateMar 20 '18 at 03:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 69%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6570
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 15.9
2-Core 31.9
21% 30 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 32.2
4% 32.2 Pts
64-Core 32.6
2% 32.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Royal BNA Driver
Legend(17AA 213A) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 3.0.0.86
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.51 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Warp V2 32GB SSD
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.10104 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.1% Very poor
Read 149
Write 37.8
Mixed 46
17% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 1.73
21% 5.14 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.49% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.6 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.5
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 8.49%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 28479XU Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 28479XU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback