Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-D2V  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '16 at 08:22
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 191
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 266
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 266
16% 266 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3540
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 4.53
3% 4.68 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.22
5% 5.69 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 363
Write 234
Mixed 198
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 14.1
74% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 28.2
DQ Write 61.1
DQ Mixed 14.1
19% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 91%
Apricorn Padlock 3.0 1.5TB
665GB free, PID 0310
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 32.6
Write 29
Mixed 14.2
30% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 39%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
29GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 31
Write 27.8
Mixed 7.46
26% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.31
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-D2V Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-D2V - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $26Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback