Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '18 at 11:36
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3450-$59 34,199 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 84.9 1-Core 95 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 287 42% 310 Pts	64-Core 359 22% 359 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 3001) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40.5% Average	Lighting 52.9 Reflection 34.7 Parallax 66.3 43% 51.3 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 44.1 36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 39%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8621 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 881 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 46 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 41 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15768202872	52.2% Above average	Read 267 Write 210 Mixed 216 51% 231 MB/s	4K Read 28.4 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 18.2 90% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 55.6 DQ Mixed 19.4 22% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 029E CMY8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	751x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	508x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	385x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	151x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	145x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	75x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	70x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	55x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16