Lenovo 4260A49

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4260A49  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4260A49
Memory8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '18 at 18:56
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 172
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 382
40% 321 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 21.21.13.7691
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.62
1% 1.09 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 1.09
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3ZC70F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 87.5
73% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.27
56% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-G7 HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 10GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4260A49 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4260A49

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback