Intel DX79SR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemINTEL_ DX79SR__
MotherboardIntel DX79SR  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 15:08
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 555
55% 447 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
PNY(196E 0969) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 314.7
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 37.5
Parallax 44.5
31% 40.1 fps
MRender 49.7
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 36.3
35% 44.3 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 250GB
165GB free
Firmware: PWG4 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 469
Write 308
Mixed 376
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 13.4
55% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78.7
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 23.8
28% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 65%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 496
Write 243
Mixed 291
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 13.8
60% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 63.8
74% 130 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 71%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
559GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 66.3
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.13
4K Mixed 0.64
175% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 80%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
159GB free
Firmware: 04.04V02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 103
Mixed 56.6
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.61
157% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 69%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 500GB
466GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 35
Write 35.6
Mixed 14.4
34% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.22
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 22%
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 64GB-$104
16GB free, PID 162b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 226
Write 71
Mixed 50
114% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.88
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.87
87% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 83%
Generic USB CF Reader 4GB
2GB free, PID 6377
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 17.4
Write 11.1
Mixed 11.8
16% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 1.13
122% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x46332D323430304331302D38475458 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DX79SR Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel DX79SR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $607
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback