EVGA 151-SX-E299

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-SX-E299  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '18 at 05:18
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 237
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 772
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,052
65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 142
Parallax 133
109% 136 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 127
Splatting 102
92% 114 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 960GB
715GB free
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 740
Mixed 717
164% 732 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 19.5
98% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 85.2
119% 217 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
230GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 394
Mixed 407
96% 430 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 39.4
136% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 122
135% 229 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 133%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 471
Write 352
Mixed 408
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 3.97
72% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 22.5
72% 152 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 94
Write 104
Mixed 97.8
74% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.27
84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 59%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 70.9
Write 70.7
Mixed 68.5
53% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.4
103% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
9GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 137
Write 97.8
Mixed 115
144% 116 MB/s
4K Read 5.94
4K Write 3.26
4K Mixed 1.62
188% 3.61 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 22
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 23.1
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 9
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 151-SX-E299 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: EVGA 151-SX-E299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $990
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback