HP ZBook 15

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 15  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1909
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4900MQ-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 84.5
2-Core 166
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 391
46% 354 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
HP(103C 1909) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8607
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.23
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.24 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 450 256GB-$206
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 500
Write 478
Mixed 480
109% 486 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 15.1
74% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 12.4
18% 32.8 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 9905428-123.A00LF Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.2% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 19.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 Builds (Compare 421 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback