Sonic Mediasite Recorder R04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSonic Mediasite Recorder R04  (all builds)
MotherboardBCM MX57QM
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 66.8
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 149
56% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 192
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 4.38
Parallax 4.44
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 4.91 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 264
Write 195
Mixed 207
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 20.5
81% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 67.3
65% 103 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.5 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback