Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P9X79 PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140725
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '18 at 07:04
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53 4,803 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 91.1 1-Core 69 2-Core 138 62% 99.3 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 475 46% 375 Pts	64-Core 697 43% 697 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)	57.6% Above average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 69.2 Parallax 67.6 58% 69.4 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 67.8 Splatting 69.6 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme PLEXTOR PX-256M8 256GB 527 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	169% Outstanding	Read 1,784 Write 841 Mixed 963 263% 1,196 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 39.2 128% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 66.5 68% 112 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 169% Great: 205%
OCZ SOLID3 60GB 1,153 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 5GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 120 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 21663815055036 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4590 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 259 (B1) Unknown 0 0 7 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17670 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8630 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8630 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17224	37.9% Below average	Read 200 Write 58.6 Mixed 82.6 25% 114 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 12.9 81% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 75.2 DQ Write 56.3 DQ Mixed 21.2 28% 50.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 50%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 360GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21494104358 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3346 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6024 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1955 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3352 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3352 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 188979544090 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74.5% Very good	Read 136 Write 124 Mixed 134 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.22 101% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 108%
Toshiba MK1653GSX 160GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 51GB free Firmware: LW005B Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1004 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11291 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 10636 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4760 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 95 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 62 62 382237 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159216663 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 4 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 114 (DE) Loaded hours 90 90 4199 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 345 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 8	31.5% Below average	Read 54.1 Write 55.5 Mixed 61.4 43% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.25 73% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 35%
Seagate ST3320620NS 320GB-$40 953 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 31GB free Firmware: 3.AEK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 93 179813081 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10854 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 44 1907859957904 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24430 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 93 93 7786 (BB) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 554762273 (C2) HDA temperature 33 55 55834574881 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 54 80212680 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 188 1101 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	35.2% Below average	Read 53.9 Write 68.6 Mixed 58 45% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.36 80% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 36 MC Mixed 33.4 102% 35.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.6 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 53%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	544x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	391x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	99x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	85x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	84x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	45x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	39x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	36x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	34x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	32x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 8x4GBKingstonBench 86%, 505 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $942

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16