Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 25 '16 at 08:17
Run Duration412 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
50% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 250
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Gigabyte(1458 21D9) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.18% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 8.85
Parallax 6.53
6% 7.63 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9.35
6% 7.52 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 256GB-$240
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 474
Write 419
Mixed 457
100% 450 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 20.2
74% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 42.9
39% 56.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
450GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
67% Good
Read 118
Write 115
Mixed 105
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.48
109% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67%
Great: 70%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
414GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 122
Write 112
Mixed 120
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.51
145% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 76%
Lexar JumpDrive 4GB
3GB free, PID a201
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 3.07
Mixed 5.14
8% 8.31 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
7% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback