Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 21 '18 at 14:11
Run Duration	263 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Memory 83.3 1-Core 147 2-Core 287 94% 172 Pts	4-Core 585 8-Core 960 94% 773 Pts	64-Core 1,230 76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85E4) CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2857 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	129% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 192 Parallax 207 144% 192 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 189 Splatting 132 122% 150 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 1TB-$90 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 673GB free Firmware: R060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 403 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 22 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1 (AE) Unknown 100 100 6 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 72 61 167504838684 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 892360515 (F7) Unknown 100 100 27941364 (F8) Unknown 100 100 15553716 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4388 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	80.1% Excellent	Read 476 Write 338 Mixed 344 86% 386 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 58.3 4K Mixed 25 98% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 49.6 87% 172 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 1,783 Write 1,311 Mixed 1,230 320% 1,441 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 43.1 177% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 395 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 117 137% 242 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 254%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$137 23,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7212 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 12 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 31 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 12 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 197569413161 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 31 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 547 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	99.8% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 169 Mixed 162 128% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.81 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.26 145% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 104%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3TB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 169 8141 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2487 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 199 0 (09) Power-on hours count 66 66 25331 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 706 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 285 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 19716 (C2) HDA temperature 116 105 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	63.4% Good	Read 119 Write 101 Mixed 103 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.17 75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 163525888 (03) Spinup time 95 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6443 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 58 58 51548171041 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 32664 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 875 (B7) Unknown 96 96 4 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 4295032835 (BD) vendor-specific 58 58 42 (BE) vendor-specific 65 49 537459294243 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 318 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 89 89 23581 (C2) HDA temperature 35 51 -140737488355293 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 105733504910886 (F1) Unknown 100 253 9987716207 (F2) Unknown 100 253 21775848406	65.3% Good	Read 156 Write 72 Mixed 62.3 72% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.14 46% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 96%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 620GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 175 5975 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4852 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20936 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 739 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 315 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 188 188 38307 (C2) HDA temperature 116 103 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	70% Very good	Read 122 Write 122 Mixed 123 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.28 104% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 456GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 178 5833 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7564 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24168 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 998 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 339 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 190 190 32652 (C2) HDA temperature 117 105 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	59% Above average	Read 96.3 Write 109 Mixed 108 79% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.21 84% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 317GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 131 126 6425 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12305 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 19 19 59161 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1407 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 454 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 76967 (C2) HDA temperature 113 100 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 21 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 19 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 21	36.4% Below average	Read 66.3 Write 60.5 Mixed 76.5 51% 67.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 3,586 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	MC Read 25.8 MC Write 61.1 MC Mixed 27.9 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 10.6 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 74.6 54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 700 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	181x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	135x
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	69x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $1,122

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16