HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory12.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 08 '24 at 07:44
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 192
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 475
51% 405 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 75
Parallax 70.8
59% 72.7 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 71.9
Splatting 58.7
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
229GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 869 757 743 742 724 716 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,960
Write 1,894
Mixed 1,497
SusWrite 758
342% 1,527 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 56.5
188% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 686
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 637
477% 635 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 211%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
83GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 293 294 293 294 293 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 451
Mixed 395
SusWrite 311
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 46.9
146% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 362
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 124%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 149 149 147 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 147
83% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 149 151 151 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 155
Write 166
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 147
90% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.3
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM5A56 24MP56
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback